The showrunners have previously stated that they felt this intro helped set the stage by informing viewers that the people in this show were aware of that threat on a least some level before it actually happened. As you probably know, that suggestion turned out to be tragically prophetic.
During that panel, one of the researchers suggests that the greatest threat to humanity is actually a fungal infection accelerated by global warming (though those words aren’t used).
#Ellie face the last of us part 2 vs 1 tv#
It opens with a snippet from a fictional 1968 TV program in which a host discusses global apocalyptic scenarios with two researchers (always a pleasant bit of programming). Whereas the game’s opening takes us back to the early days of the Cordyceps infection (more on that in a bit), the show goes even further back in time than that. If you spot any significant changes you think we missed, though, let us know about them in the comments. Instead, we’ve primarily focused on changes that either impacted The Last of Us‘ overall narrative (or specific character arcs) in significant ways or notably altered a memorable event from the game. While you’ll find a list of those differences below, keep in mind that we’re emphasizing the word “major.” That means this article doesn’t reference things like different camera shots, different actors, or even slightly different dialog sequences.
#Ellie face the last of us part 2 vs 1 series#
Of course, as with all adaptations, there are some major differences between the HBO series and its source material. While many predicted that the show had the potential to be the finest live-action adaptation of a video game ever, it really was remarkable to see all the ways the show successfully adapted the game’s legendary story. The Last of Us first season is finally over. A remake would do TLOU a lot of good, and I say that knowing TLOU is already my second favorite game of all time.This article contains spoilers for The Last of Us HBO show and The Last of Us Part 1 game. It's still perfectly playable, but there's a massive gap between how well it plays and how outstandingly well TLOU2 plays. I've played it over 20 times now and have become too well-acquainted with the many bugs and combat issues. But the jank is so incredibly undeniable. It is absolutely showing its age at this point.ĭon't get me wrong, I believe it's aged very well.
The remaster came out barely a year after the initial release and all it really did was polish textures and bump the frame rate. 10 years is an incredible length of time for software, and TLOU only has a year and a half to go before meeting that checkpoint. This was something Schreier himself talked about in a podcast a little while ago, I believe.Īlso "not even 10 years old" is a pretty dishonest way of putting it.
This actually gives the crew something to do while they hash out a roadmap for the next game.
Whereas a remake - especially one that can reuse all the assets already generated during the production of TLOU2 - can essentially skip all that. Any new game Naughty Dog could be working on will still be in pre-production as we speak. Moreover, I think anybody who thinks it's somehow an inappropriate use of resources to focus on a remake instead of a full-ass new game has a misguided understanding of how dev cycles generally work. It was a Schreier leak, and his hit rate is pretty unmatched. Well, the remake is happening either way.
0 kommentar(er)
